The consciousness of the profound and lasting results of trauma on human well being has considerably elevated over the previous few many years. Traumatic experiences can create rippling results throughout complete communities and households, impacting even those that haven’t instantly skilled such occasions. Understanding these penalties is essential for psychological well being professionals and society as an entire.
Research has investigated whether or not the impression of trauma will be transmitted throughout generations, and in that case, via what mechanisms. Studies focusing on people uncovered to excessive occasions, similar to Holocaust survivors, present compelling proof for this phenomenon. These research have proven that each survivors and their offspring are at a heightened threat for varied psychological well being issues (Dashorst et al., 2019). Several theories have been proposed to elucidate this “intergenerational inheritance of trauma,” together with modifications in social behaviors, parenting kinds, and even organic alterations that have an effect on DNA via DNA methylation.
DNA methylation is a organic course of involving the addition of small molecules to particular websites within the genome, which might regulate gene expression. These molecules are dynamically added and eliminated throughout improvement and all through maturity, responding to each inner indicators from the physique and exterior environmental influences. Methylation features like a dimmer change for close by genes, modulating their exercise primarily based on varied indicators and contexts.
Despite the intriguing speculation that trauma will be inherited through DNA methylation, this subject stays contentious, significantly because of the restricted proof derived from human research. A latest paper printed in Scientific Reports investigates whether or not experiences of violence throughout wartime have left organic markers within the DNA of Syrian refugee households via methylation and whether or not these modifications will be handed down via a number of generations (Mulligan et al., 2025).

Our life experiences can considerably alter the patterns of DNA methylation throughout our genome.
Research Methodology for Examining Intergenerational Trauma
This research gathered complete knowledge from 48 Syrian households residing in Jordan, comprising a complete of 131 people together with grandmothers, moms, and kids. Each household had skilled conflict both through the Nineteen Eighties, 2010s, or had relocated to Jordan earlier than 1980. This allowed researchers to categorize members primarily based on their publicity to conflict:
- Direct publicity: Individuals (grandmothers, moms, or youngsters) who personally skilled conflict.
- Prenatal publicity: Mothers or youngsters whose moms endured conflict whereas pregnant.
- Germline publicity: Children whose grandmothers skilled conflict throughout their mom’s being pregnant, affecting the egg that grew to become the kid.
- Control group: Individuals (grandmothers, moms, or youngsters) who didn’t expertise conflict.
Participants had been interviewed concerning their life occasions to quantify the number of war-related or violent experiences they’d encountered. This qualitative knowledge was important for understanding the contextual background of every participant’s experiences.
To analyze DNA methylation, researchers collected samples from buccal (interior cheek) swabs, measuring methylation at over 850,000 websites throughout the genome. These samples underwent rigorous high quality management. The methylation profiles of people in every conflict publicity class (direct, prenatal, or germline) had been in comparison with the management group utilizing two distinct analytical strategies:
- Epigenome-wide affiliation research (EWAS): This technique identifies particular genomic websites with differing ranges of DNA methylation. The related genes present perception into the potential organic implications of those variations (Campagna et al., 2021).
- Epigenetic age acceleration: This idea includes calculating epigenetic age primarily based on DNA methylation ranges throughout particular websites. Acceleration, the place epigenetic age exceeds chronological age, is often noticed in people who’ve confronted substantial hardships or power diseases (Wang et al., 2022).
The analyses had been adjusted for varied confounding components that might affect DNA methylation, together with intercourse, age, the estimated proportion of pores and skin cells within the buccal swabs, and genetic relatedness inside households.
Key Findings on the Relationship Between Trauma and DNA Methylation
Among the 131 research members, 43 skilled direct publicity to conflict, 28 had been uncovered prenatally to conflict, 18 had germline publicity, and 42 had no publicity to conflict in any respect.
Out of the 768,625 genomic websites that met high quality management requirements, the EWAS analyses revealed a restricted variety of statistically vital variances in DNA methylation:
- Syrian refugees who skilled conflict instantly exhibited distinct DNA methylation ranges at 21 websites.
- Those who skilled conflict via the germline confirmed variations in DNA methylation at 14 websites.
- No vital variations in DNA methylation had been famous for people uncovered to conflict prenatally.
Interestingly, 32 out of those 35 websites exhibited DNA methylation variations in the identical path (larger or decrease) throughout the varied sorts of conflict publicity, though these findings weren’t statistically vital. This means that experiencing conflict throughout completely different developmental levels might yield comparable organic penalties, no matter whether or not the expertise was direct or linked to a previous technology.
The researchers additional investigated the connection between DNA methylation at these 35 websites and the variety of war-related occasions skilled by people. They found that, in lots of situations, the depend of war-related occasions correlated with DNA methylation ranges, indicating that not solely is DNA methylation influenced by any publicity to conflict, however that this relationship is proportionate; a better load of traumatic occasions correlates with a extra vital impression on DNA.
What implications do these DNA methylation variations carry? To tackle this inquiry, the analysis staff examined the genes positioned nearest to those DNA methylation websites. However, the genes didn’t exhibit any widespread features or outcomes, which hindered the researchers from making predictions about their organic penalties. This uncertainty means that whereas DNA methylation variations had been recognized, their useful significance stays elusive.
Interestingly, the research discovered restricted convincing proof linking conflict publicity to epigenetic age. Only youngsters who confronted prenatal publicity to conflict exhibited some indicators of accelerated epigenetic growing older, indicating that their epigenetic age appeared older than their chronological age. If the authors had accounted for the variety of statistical checks carried out, this discovering may need been deemed an opportunity prevalence. This implies that the impression of conflict publicity on epigenetic growing older in these teams is comparatively minimal in comparison with different sorts of traumatic experiences (Bourassa & Sbarra, 2024) and doesn’t appear to be transmitted via generations.

War publicity skilled both instantly or by an individual’s pregnant grandparent was related to completely different DNA methylation ranges at 35 completely different websites throughout the genome. However, the precise implications of those variations on particular person well being stay unclear.
Key Takeaways from the Research Findings
The authors assert:
This represents the primary documented occasion of an intergenerational epigenetic signature of violence.
This analysis contributes worthwhile proof indicating that traumatic experiences similar to conflict and violence might result in persistent organic variations, though a definitive hyperlink to useful or health-related outcomes has but to be established. The findings counsel that these organic variations may persist throughout a number of generations, regardless of the timing of publicity to conflict, thereby hinting at the potential for intergenerational inheritance. Nonetheless, additional exploration is crucial to establish whether or not this really displays the “inheritance of trauma.”

The research noticed modest associations between conflict publicity and DNA methylation throughout three generations. However, does this indicate that these results will be inherited from grandmother to grandchild?
Strengths and Limitations of the Study
The major strengths of this research are rooted in its distinctive inhabitants and strong research design. By focusing on households of Syrian refugees, the analysis staff captured genuine publicity to excessive adversity occurring inside outlined time durations. Such circumstances are difficult for researchers to duplicate artificially, offering vital insights into the potential ramifications of conflict, a sadly prevalent expertise globally (ACLED, 2024). The multigenerational design of the research enabled the researchers to match teams that skilled the identical wars via completely different publicity sorts, whether or not instantly, prenatally, or through the germline. In distinction, most epigenetic research focus on one or two generations, limiting complete comparisons. Furthermore, the researchers employed well-established DNA methylation measurement strategies, guaranteeing applicable statistical controls for a number of testing and household construction of their EWAS analyses.
However, a number of limitations constrain the research’s contributions to our understanding of the intergenerational inheritance of trauma.
Small pattern measurement: While the research offers worthwhile insights, a pattern measurement of 60-85 people is comparatively modest for an EWAS, which generally contains tons of or 1000’s of members. Smaller samples are extra inclined to each false positives and false negatives when analyzing in depth datasets, and findings is probably not replicable in bigger populations.
Correlation doesn’t indicate causation: A typical problem with observational research is the lack to definitively attribute DNA methylation variations to conflict publicity. Numerous unmeasured variables might differentiate the teams, significantly for the reason that management group has resided in Jordan for a considerably longer length. Factors similar to vitamin, bodily well being, or socio-economic standing might contribute to variations between uncovered and management teams.
A snapshot in time: This research solely assessed DNA methylation at a single time limit, limiting the researchers’ skill to establish when these methylation variations emerged or whether or not any modifications have occurred over time. This data is crucial to verify whether or not patterns are genuinely inherited via the germline or in the event that they arose at one other level earlier than testing.

The research recognized DNA methylation variations in teams that skilled conflict at a particular time, but it surely stays unclear when these modifications occurred and what components contributed to them.
Practical Implications for Future Research
This vital research contributes to a burgeoning but contentious analysis area suggesting that trauma might go away enduring marks on the genome that persist throughout generations. Previous investigations into survivors of genocide (Rivera et al., 2024), Holocaust survivors (Yehuda et al., 2016), and famine survivors (Heijmans et al., 2008) have documented comparable methylation modifications in offspring. However, the findings introduced by Mulligan and colleagues present further proof that comparable methylation patterns will be noticed in a 3rd technology. Despite the intriguing outcomes, many questions stay unanswered earlier than these findings will be virtually utilized.
Do methylation variations carry significance? An growing variety of research point out that DNA methylation patterns differ in relation to traumatic experiences similar to conflict (together with my very own analysis – full disclosure; Smeeth et al., 2023), but we frequently lack readability concerning their implications. The regulation of the genome is exceedingly complicated, and variations in methylation don’t mechanically translate into observable well being outcomes. Compounding this difficulty, many noticed methylation variations are minimal, even when deemed “statistically significant.”
Are these organic markers of trauma? Labeling these methylation modifications as indicators of “trauma” will be overly simplistic and will exaggerate the potential dangers for future generations. While the experiences of the research members had been undoubtedly traumatic, the biology measured doesn’t instantly seize the psychological points of trauma. Instead, it displays variations in methylation amongst teams which have undergone vastly completely different experiences, which may embody displacement, poverty, or sickness along with conflict. DNA methylation variations might come up from any of those components and will even symbolize adaptive modifications supposed to defend people from additional hurt quite than embodying a molecular “wound” (Liu, 2015).
Can methylation patterns be inherited? Although comparable DNA methylation patterns had been noticed throughout generations, the extent to which these patterns will be transmitted from the germline to later life is extremely debated (Horsthemke, 2018). Generally, methylation patterns are largely erased throughout egg fertilization. While some areas might stay unaffected, it stays to be demonstrated whether or not these areas align with these altered by traumatic experiences.
Despite these unresolved questions, this research serves as a vital piece within the intricate and ongoing exploration of how life experiences form our biology and have an effect on future generations. While we can not definitively declare that trauma is biologically inherited via DNA, it lays the groundwork for extra knowledgeable and focused analysis into this phenomenon. Importantly, the absence of stable proof for direct organic inheritance of trauma doesn’t diminish the actual and lasting impacts that traumatic experiences like conflict have on communities and households.

Further analysis is crucial to uncover the molecular mechanisms affected by conflict and trauma.
Researcher Statement of Interests
Demelza has beforehand labored on associated analysis inspecting DNA methylation and conflict publicity in Syrian refugee youngsters, however she didn’t take part on this explicit research.
Gratitude and Acknowledgments
Special because of Professor Michael Pluess for reviewing this weblog and offering insightful suggestions.
Essential Links and References
Primary Research Paper
Mulligan, C. J., Quinn, E. B., Hamadmad, D., Dutton, C. L., Nevell, L., Binder, A. M., Panter-Brick, C., & Dajani, R. (2025). Epigenetic signatures of intergenerational publicity to violence in three generations of Syrian refugees. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 5945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89818-z
Additional References
ACLED. (2024). Conflict Index: December 2024. Global conflicts double over the previous 5 years. https://acleddata.com/conflict-index/index-december-2024/
Bourassa, Ok. J., & Sbarra, D. A. (2024). Trauma, adversity, and organic growing older: Behavioral mechanisms related to therapy and principle. Translational Psychiatry, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03004-9
Campagna, M. P., Xavier, A., Lechner-Scott, J., Maltby, V., Scott, R. J., Butzkueven, H., Jokubaitis, V. G., & Lea, R. A. (2021). Epigenome-wide affiliation research: Current information, methods, and suggestions. Clinical Epigenetics, 13(1), 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-021-01200-8
Dashorst, P., Mooren, Trudy M., Kleber, Rolf J., de Jong, Peter J., & Huntjens, R. J. C. (2019). Intergenerational penalties of the Holocaust on offspring psychological well being: A scientific overview of related components and mechanisms. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 10(1), 1654065. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1654065
Liu, R. T. (2015). A developmentally knowledgeable perspective on the relation between stress and psychopathology: When the issue with stress is that there’s not sufficient. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000043
Smeeth, D., McEwen, F. S., Popham, C. M., Karam, E. G., Fayyad, J., Saab, D., Rieder, M. J., Elzagallaai, A. A., van Uum, S., & Pluess, M. (2023). War publicity, post-traumatic stress signs, and hair cortisol concentrations in Syrian refugee youngsters. Molecular Psychiatry, 28(2), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01859-2
Wang, Ok., Liu, H., Hu, Q., Wang, L., Liu, J., Zheng, Z., Zhang, W., Ren, J., Zhu, F., & Liu, G.-H. (2022). Epigenetic regulation of growing older: Implications for interventions in growing older and ailments. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01211-8
Photo Credits
Ann Miller is a certified mental health coach and wellness writer with a strong background in psychology and emotional resilience. With over a decade of experience in helping individuals manage stress, anxiety, and burnout, Ann specializes in making complex mental health topics accessible and empowering.
She holds a Master's degree in Clinical Psychology and has worked with both individual clients and organizations to promote emotional well-being and work-life balance. Through her writing, Ann aims to break the stigma surrounding mental health and offer practical, compassionate guidance for everyday challenges.
When she's not writing or consulting, Ann enjoys early morning yoga, quiet reading time, and exploring nature trails with her dog. Her personal philosophy: "Mental health is not a luxury — it’s a foundation for everything we do."